HC orders SFIO Investigation for BPTP

Posted By Admin on Sep 20, 2012
Members ( ) | |
JoinWrite Comments
Read Blog

Requested Comments

Recent Comments

HC orders SFIO Investigation for BPTP
 
BPTP Parkland Pride
Posted by Apoorv 02 Apr 2013

Update on parkland pride court case. All DD motor case for parkland pride sector 77 are disposed off. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R 19.03.2013 Crl. M.A. No. 3547/2013 (u/S 482 Cr.P.C.) in Crl. M.C. No.13/2012 Mr. Mohit Gupta, learned counsel for intervener- Devender Kumar Jain, who had sought his impleadment in this petition by application being Crl. M.A. No. 18504/2012, submits that since all disputes with BPTP Ltd. have been settled, he does not want to be impleaded in this case. Learned counsel submits that this application is also accompanied by affidavit of applicant ? Devender Kumar Jain and on his instructions, learned counsel seeks permission of the Court to withdraw Crl. M.A. No. 18504/2012. In the light of above, this application is allowed and is accordingly disposed of. Crl.M.A.N.18504/2012 (u/S 482 Cr.P.C.) in Crl. M.C. No.13/2012 In view of orders passed in Crl. M.A. No. 3547/2013, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. Crl. M.A. No. 18370/20123 (u/S 482 Cr.P.C.) in Crl. M.C. No.13/2012 Mr. Shivam Garg, learned counsel for applicant- Sanjay Bakshi, who had sought implemented in this petition, submits that all disputes with petitioners have now been settled, as post dated cheques have been given by petitioner to the applicant herein, and subject to their encashment, learned counsel seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this application. Subject to encashment of aforementioned post date cheques, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. Crl. M.A. No. 12070/2012 in Crl. M.C. No.13/2012 Crl. M.A. No. 12071/2012 in Crl. M.C. No. 31/2012 Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Learned counsel for applicants, on instructions seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these applications, as it has now transpired that petitioner has already deposited a sum of `16.63crores with the Registrar General of this Court, with liberty to initiate proceedings against petitioner in accordance with the law, if need be. In light of the above, afore-captioned two applications are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. Crl. M.C. No.13/2012 Crl. M.C. No. 31/2012 Mr. Anil Sapra, learned senior counsel for respondent No.2/ complainants in the afore-captioned two petitions, submits that Ms. Anju Goel and Mr. Suresh Goel, have also settled their dispute with petitioner and they have no objection to the quashing of FIR in question. Mr. Mohit Gupta, learned counsel for interveners Manish Anand, Adarsh Publication, Kamal Ahuja, Mr. Som Nath Munjal, Mr. Megh Shayam Aggarwal and Mr. Pramod Kumar Garg, submits that he has instructions to state that dispute of afore-named interveners has also been settled with petitioner. Mr. Sunil Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State seeks time to verify and file fresh Status Report within two weeks. Let it be so done. Renotify on 11th April, 2013. SUNIL GAUR, J MARCH 19, 2013

Reply: The case has not been disposed off, only applications disposed off. Also public prosecutor asked to filed fresh status report. Next hearing fixed for 11th April.


Related Comments       Reply to comment       Post New Comments       

AIPMT Mock Test
Indiaspaces.com Newsletter   For Exclusive Newsletter
  • Indiaspaces Policy
    		•
  • Disclaimer
    		•  Creation of : Innovations Computech Pvt. Ltd.
    @ 2012 indiaspaces.com